跳至主要内容

邪恶的沃尔玛网购


http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/shopping/32017589.html

发信人: lionphone (It\'s good!), 信区: shopping
标  题: 邪恶的沃尔玛网购
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Sep 28 18:41:53 2012, 美东)

我刚搬到一个新的城市,于是在walmart网站上买过不少家具之类的东西。查账的时候
,突然发现walmart帐号里有两单iTune e-giftcard 的order, 不是我下的。一单被
walmart cancel掉,第二单成功,而且居然发了e-gift card到我的电子邮箱里!
我跟信用卡公司申诉,今天收到结果说,walmart提供了购买信息,以及已经把e-gift
card发到了我电子邮箱的记录。也就是说没有帮我argue成功。然后我又从order买单那
个地方发信给walmart,结果walmart推皮球,如所附。
难道这哑巴亏就这么吃定了?好恶心的walmart网购经历。不是在乎那$25,而是这个过
程好让人恶心。网购无数,居然被walmart给涮了一把。而且,我现在无论如何在
walmart上下单,都被walmart cancel掉。
*******************
Hi xxx,

Thank you for contacting Walmart.com regarding you needing to have the
refund processed for the charge of $25.00 that you did not issue.

xxx, we apologize for the inconvenience. Unfortunately, at this point, you
will need to dispute the charges with your financial provider, as we are
uanble to process the refund for the order.

If you have additional questions, please reply to this email, or call us xxx
at 1-800-966-6546.

Sincerely,
Walmart.com Customer Care
 
Original Message Follows
-------------------------
09/28/2012 03:59 PM from you:
Is it so difficult for WalMart to cancel an order and make refund for a $25
order?

Sent from my Windows Phone


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
From: Walmart Resolutions
Sent: 9/28/2012 4:02 PM
To: xxx@hotmail.com
Subject: I want to cancel my order [Incident: 120928-005218]




-------------------------
09/28/2012 03:02 PM from Walmart Resolutions:
Hi xxx,

Thank you for contacting Walmart.com regarding unauthorized charges on your
account.  We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you.

Walmart.com will release information to law enforcement on behalf of
requesting customers once we are provided with the following documentation:
A copy of a police report on police letterhead evidencing the claim of fraud
by the victim of identity theft
A declaration from the victim certifying the accuracy of the police report
and authorizing Walmart.com to release information to the law enforcement
department identified in that report
The completed documents can be faxed to 1-479-204-0074. Once the fax is
received, our billing department will work with your local authorities to
provide the requested information as quickly as possible.

xxx, if we have not fully answered your question or you have additional
questions, please reply to this email.

Sincerely,
Walmart.com Customer Care
 
-------------------------
09/28/2012 02:13 PM from you:
Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for your reply.
I contacted DiscoverCard for unauthorized purchase to my Discover Card. I
got reply from DiscoverCard today. It states that Walmart insisted that the
purchase is valid.
The difficult thing is that this is an online purchase, and emailed order.
The e-gift card was sent to my email box. So it may not be appropriate to
direct to "Identity Theft", that said, it could be more likely that a
purchase made by mistake by Walmart staff or internet.

I don't have an iPhone. I don't have any reason to make such an order of i
-Tune egift card. What's the meaning for me?

I didn't find  any place in my Walmart account to cancel this order.

Thank you.

xxx
From: Walmart Resolutions

Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 2:56 PM
To: xxx@hotmail.com
Subject: I want to cancel my order [Incident: 120928-005218]

 
-------------------------
09/28/2012 01:56 PM from Walmart Resolutions:
Hi xxx,

Thank you for contacting Walmart.com regarding an unauthorized charged made
on your account. We sincerely apologize for any inconveniences you may have
endured.

We have escalated your information to our billling department and we are
monitoring your account. Please contact your credit card company to dispute
the charges and inform them of the unauthorized use.

If you wish to obtain further details about an order, please go to www.
walmartstores.com/privacysecurity/ follow the instructions under the "
Identity Theft" section and fill out the affidavit.

The completed documents can be faxed to 1-479-204-0074. Once the fax is
received, our billing department will send all the information requested to
you.

xxx, if we have not fully answered your question or you have additional
questions, please reply to this email.

Sincerely,
Walmart.com Customer Care
 
-------------------------
09/28/2012 01:14 PM from you:
I didn't make this order. Please correct this stupid mistake made by walmart
or internet, and make refund to me!!!!
 

[---001:003252:57410---]
************

--

※ 修改:·lionphone 於 Sep 28 18:44:25 2012 修改本文·[FROM: 72.]

评论

此博客中的热门博文

记者探访H&M实体店,店员:我们也爱国,希望明天就关门

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/ChinaNews/32684337.html 发信人: jiuna (), 信区: ChinaNews 标  题: 记者探访H&M实体店,店员:我们也爱国,希望明天就关门 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 25 02:55:55 2021, 美东) 3月25日中午,《环球时报》记者走访了北京市三里屯核心商区,探访新疆棉事件对H&M 及Nike等品牌实体店的影响。记者发现,在整整占据了三层的北京最大的H&M店之一的 店铺内,顾客稀少,门可罗雀,一些路人进店挑选后也选择不购买其产品即离开。 "看到了H&M和Nike的声明之后,近期不会再购买他们的产品了。既然想在中国做生意 ,还侮辱中国人,那中国人肯定不会支持,"一位路人在接受《环球时报》采访时表示 。"抵制他们的产品对我们并不会产生什么影响,因为替代产品有很多。国内很多品牌 都有很好的设计和质量,大多数时间也都在网上逛淘宝,样式和质量都比H&M好很多, "一位姓赵的北京居民表示。 在接受采访时,一些路人表示,除非H&M展现出道歉的诚意,否则将来也不会再选择这 个品牌。 位于上海某繁华商业街的一家HM店,今天门口有保安值守,店员十分警戒,不让记者拍 摄。两名店员对《环球时报》记者表示他们也希望明天就关店,也不希望发生这样的事 情,他们也是爱国的,但他们只是店员,希望得到记者理解。 王先生是一位在上海南京西路附近上班的打工族,由于听到关于HM的消息,他特地在午 休时间来HM店面转转。王先生告诉记者,"作为一家大公司应该吸取经验教训,在中国 做生意,想赚中国人的钱,就更应该尊重中国人民的感情。" 王先生告诉记者,中国老百姓应该拿出一点实际行动,给这些国外公司一些警告以及反 馈信息。王先生说希望这个事件能给更多的类似企业传递更多的信息,中国人民欢迎外 企来做生意,但是前提一定是秉持公平公正的原则,尊重中国人民的感情。 -- ...

心胸狭窄的固执琐男还是不少

http://www.mitbbs.com//article_t/WaterWorld/2512547.html 发信人: Tianzi (Sun Scracher), 信区: WaterWorld 标  题: 心胸狭窄的固执琐男还是不少 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Sep 28 10:28:35 2014, 美东) 声明我是男的。 有些国男很固执。国男里面死死纠缠一个女人的比比皆是,哪怕女人拒绝多次,也契而 不舍,让人反感。我就不明白了,这世界上好女人多的是,为什么在一颗草上吊死?每 次发生国男因情打杀女友的事件,我跟前LD和现LD都说过,来去自由哈(每次都被追打 )。以前有个女友跟我提出分手的时候,我哭了一个小时,回家打了一晚游戏,第二天 就追别的女生去了,很快就又找到了快乐。人与人之间是独立的,谁也不欠谁的。 有些国男总有种奇特的想法:女人跟他有了关系或者曾经谈过朋友就是他的人了。这种 人往往生活中也计较,心胸狭窄,没什么知心朋友,于是往往寂寞孤单。很多还其貌不 扬,能找到一个女友,自然不会轻易放过。说到底,教育出了大问题。不少是从小只被 要求学习好,性格心理没有好好培养。长大,人变的很固执,用在好的方面可能有很大 成就;用在坏的方面,就可能做坏事。 --

制度的O,应该基于信任?还是不信任?

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/USANews/33945337.html 发信人: ai1901 (笑看众生), 信区: USANews 标  题: 制度的O,应该基于信任?还是不信任? 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 30 03:27:45 2020, 美东) 初到中国,立刻发现一个现象:办事情特别麻烦,要的材料特别多,要盖的章数不完。 初到美国,立刻发现一个现象:打个电话就能办许多事情。 台湾居中,也是很麻烦,办什麽事情都要本人到场,还要印章。(最近才发现,更改公 司负责人,银行要你亲自到场签名给他看!) 这就是制度的设计,是基於信任?还是基於不信任? 这感触已经多年,现在想到,主要是因为底下有人说:根据美国弹劾制度的设计,国会 不爽就可以弹劾。这当然是孩子讲气话,但如果你的思维方式是防人甚於信人,不相信 人会尊重自己,以为所有人只要有机会就一定滥用,你设计出来的制度一定会非常复杂 。而且你看美国的制度,一定是充满漏洞,到处有机可趁。 这都源於你是怎麽看人?怎麽看自己? ============ 例如某位打杀哥的名言:"对左派,应该更无耻一点"。这其实体现的就是 一种不尊重自己的思维方式。你不尊重自己,你就会想要滥用一切可用的方便。如果每 个人都像他这种想法,制度的设计就必须防堵每一个方便,而这其实也就是我们在台湾 与中国看到的结果。 打杀哥,我说你不懂的尊重自己,这么说对不对? -- ※ 修改:・ai1901 於 Jan 30 04:02:22 2020 修改本文・[FROM: 2001:b400:e23a:2]