1类 140 新趋势,经验总结,后来者请注意

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32455463.html

发信人: linji (xiaoaspen), 信区: Immigration
标  题: 1类 140 新趋势,经验总结,后来者请注意陷阱.
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jun 28 18:32:26 2012, 美东)

读

http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/32437773_0_1.html 和版上一下case有感

1) 牛推荐人坏大事, 请不要提推荐人发多少paper, 多少引用,那是给自己添赌,给自己
下绊子,给自己找麻烦.最好不要找牛人,碰到较真的IO真给你google挖一下也够你喝一
户的(several of the authors of the letters of support appear to have
published recent works, as well as overall publication records, that
significantly exceed that citation record of the beneficiary.)

2) 不要说推荐人review了你的简历,得出什么什么结论. 应该是 推荐人无比敬仰你的
工作. 是仰视你,而不是审查你. 是你深刻了影响了本领域,推荐人深受启发. (some of
the authors of the letters of support explain that their opinion
has been provide after a review of the beneficiary's resume, papers, etc.)

3)不要和平均比.1A 说的是你在本领域是top的专家,而不是和平均水平的比你比较强.
你是最强,最top.(the record must demonstrate that the beneficiary has made
contributions to the field of major significance, not that he has exceeded
the average citation rate for the various topics, journals, etc.)

4) contribution 一定要证明是 major significance的. 原创性不用太多的笔墨.
describe specific examples, accomplished by corroborative evidence, of how
the beneficiary's work has been used and implemented in the field on a
widespread scale, successfully patented and commercialized for widespread
use in the field, or other such evidence of work that is not only original,
but a contribution major significance to the field as a whole.

5)VerticleNews, NewsX 等等要慎用,最近屡屡被挑战.

6) 不要说什么 young scientist. 不要提什么年龄,1类不看年龄,看成就.也不要跟同
龄人比,你比的是本领域所有的人.你就是最牛的,本领域top的才符合1类的标准.

7) 和学生相关的奖项一律不能用,因为这个不是面向本领域所有人的.

8) membership 要谨慎,除非有过硬的要求,一般不要claim

9) 媒体报道一定是报道你个人,而不是你的工作.

待续...


--